Carlson v. Moore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Carlson v. Moore

228 N.W. 937, 119 Neb. 856, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 20

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 8, 1930·No. No. 26963·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for malpractice, in which plaintiff alleged that defendant was careless and negligent 'in the operation of an X-ray used in treatment for the cure of eczema. The jury found for plaintiff in the sum of $4,175, and from a judgment entered thereon by the district court for Dawson county, defendant has appealed.

[857]*857We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for malpractice, in which plaintiff alleged that defendant was careless and negligent 'in the operation of an X-ray used in treatment for the cure of eczema. The jury found for plaintiff in the sum of $4,175, and from a judgment entered thereon by the district court for Dawson county, defendant has appealed.

[857]*857We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Carlson v. Moore, 228 N.W. 937, 119 Neb. 856, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 20 (Neb. 1930).

Pincite

228 N.W. 937 (Carlson v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.