Carlson v. Long Island Rail Road
189 N.E.2d 502, 12 N.Y.2d 984
This text of 189 N.E.2d 502 (Carlson v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carlson v. Long Island Rail Road, 189 N.E.2d 502, 12 N.Y.2d 984 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the judgment of Trial Term upon the ground that the doctrine of last clear chance applies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Forde v. New York City Transit Authority
80 A.D.2d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Carpino v. Baker
75 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
189 N.E.2d 502, 12 N.Y.2d 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlson-v-long-island-rail-road-ny-1963.