Carlson v. Johnson

190 S.E.2d 87, 126 Ga. App. 130, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1074
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 21, 1972
Docket47077
StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.E.2d 87 (Carlson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlson v. Johnson, 190 S.E.2d 87, 126 Ga. App. 130, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1074 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

In a suit on a note, defendant (and third-party plaintiff) appeals from the judgment for plaintiff in the main action. a

The evidence supported the court’s finding that , the defendant-wife executed the note as a principal. Herron v. Interstate Life &c. Co., 55 Ga. App. 534 (190 SE 631). Therefore, all other enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Panned and Quidian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herron v. Interstate Life & Accident Co.
190 S.E. 631 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.E.2d 87, 126 Ga. App. 130, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlson-v-johnson-gactapp-1972.