Carlson v. Hamilton

Idaho Supreme Court

Carlson v. Hamilton

198 P. 317, 34 Idaho 199, 1921 Ida. LEXIS 91

DecidedJuly 26, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 198 P. 317 (Carlson v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carlson v. Hamilton, 198 P. 317, 34 Idaho 199, 1921 Ida. LEXIS 91 (Idaho 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, C. J.

Respondents brought this action to recover upon a promissory note.

The only defense involved here is the allegation that the note was and is the property of the Monarch Tractor Com[200]*200pany, a foreign corporation, which has not complied with the constitution and laws of this state authorizing it to do business therein.

We have examined the transcript and find no evidence contradicting the finding of the court to the effect that the respondents were the owners of the note at the time of its delivery and continued to be the owners thereof to the time of trial.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs to respondents.

Budge, McCarthy, Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI