Carlson v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carlson v. Good Samaritan Hospital

51 A.D.2d 741, 379 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11256

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 741 (Carlson v. Good Samaritan Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carlson v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 51 A.D.2d 741, 379 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to recover damages for medical malpractice, defendant Good Samaritan Hospital appeals, on the ground of excessiveness, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered January 8, 1975, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against it, upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. On this appeal appellant does not question the jury’s finding of negligence; it limits its claim to the issue of the excessiveness of the jury’s verdict. Upon the proof adduced, we find that the verdict in favor of each respondent was not excessive. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to recover damages for medical malpractice, defendant Good Samaritan Hospital appeals, on the ground of excessiveness, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered January 8, 1975, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against it, upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. On this appeal appellant does not question the jury’s finding of negligence; it limits its claim to the issue of the excessiveness of the jury’s verdict. Upon the proof adduced, we find that the verdict in favor of each respondent was not excessive. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 741, 379 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlson-v-good-samaritan-hospital-nyappdiv-1976.