Carlson v. DSCYF
This text of Carlson v. DSCYF (Carlson v. DSCYF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
LEAH CARLSON,1 § § Respondent Below, § No. 396, 2020 Appellant, § § Court Below—Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES § File No. 20-05-05TN FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND § Petition No. 20-10674 THEIR FAMILIES (DSCYF), § § Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: July 14, 2021 Decided: July 27, 2021
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices. ORDER
This 27th day of July 2021, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs
and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Family
Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its October 21,
2020 order.
1 The Court has assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlson v. DSCYF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlson-v-dscyf-del-2021.