Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc.
This text of 649 F. App'x 309 (Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Roger F. Carlson and Mary Jo Carlson appeal the district court’s order denying their motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012) seeking attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the' district court’s decision for abuse of discretion and find none. See In re Lowe, 102 F.3d 731, 733 n. 2 (4th Cir.1996) (noting that district court has discretion to award fees on remand). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc., No. 9:15-cv-00292-SB (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 F. App'x 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlson-v-del-webb-communities-inc-ca4-2016.