Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc.

649 F. App'x 309
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2016·No. No. 15-2349·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger F. Carlson and Mary Jo Carlson appeal the district court’s order denying their motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012) seeking attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the' district court’s decision for abuse of discretion and find none. See In re Lowe, 102 F.3d 731, 733 n. 2 (4th Cir.1996) (noting that district court has discretion to award fees on remand). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc., No. 9:15-cv-00292-SB (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc., 649 F. App'x 309 (4th Cir. 2016).

649 F. App'x 309 (Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Katherine Susan Lowe
102 F.3d 731 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)