Carlson v. Carlson
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other 4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 5 filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 ALAN CARLSON,
8 Plaintiff-Appellee,
9 v. NO. 30,758
10 KIRSTEN CARLSON,
11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 13 Deborah D. Walker, District Judge
14 Border Law Office, P.A. 15 Dean E. Border 16 Albuquerque, NM
17 for Appellee
18 Kirsten Carlson 19 Edgewood, NM
20 Pro Se Appellant
21 MEMORANDUM OPINION
22 KENNEDY, Judge.
23 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.
24 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing
25 so has expired. AFFIRMED. 2 1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 3 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
4 WE CONCUR:
5 6 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
7 8 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlson v. Carlson (Carlson v. Carlson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.