Carlsen v. United States

107 F. Supp. 398, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1963
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 107 F. Supp. 398 (Carlsen v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlsen v. United States, 107 F. Supp. 398, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1963 (S.D.N.Y. 1952).

Opinion

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Whenever a new schedule is filed, the Interstate Commerce Commission, pending a hearing and decision by it as to the reasonableness of the new rates, may suspend the operation of the schedule for a period not exceeding seven months beyond the time the schedule otherwise would have become effective. 1

In the instant case, following the filing of new rate schedules by four interstate bus carriers, the plaintiff filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission a protest to the schedules and requested the Commission to suspend the proposed rates pending a determination of their reasonableness. The Commission decided against suspension, and, treating the protest as a formal complaint, set the matter down for hearing and decision. Plaintiff now seeks an order of this Court to compel the Commission to suspend the schedule pending such hearing and decision. The power of suspension of new *399 rates for the limited period authorized under Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 316(g) is vested exclusively in the Commission and the Court is without power to review the exercise of its administrative discretion. See Merchant Truckmen’s Bureau of New York v. United States, D.C., 16 F.Supp. 998; Al-goma Coal & Coke Co. v. United States, 11 F.Supp. 487, 495; Board of Railroad Com’rs v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 281 U.S. 412, 429, 50 S.Ct. 391, 74 L.Ed. 936. The Commission has, as yet, not completed its hearings and has entered no order such as would be subject to review by the Court under Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 2321, 2324, 2325 and Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 305(g).

The motion for an injunction is denied and the defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss the complaint is granted.

Settle decree on notice.

DIMOCK, District Judge, concurs in result.

1

. Section 216(g), Part II of Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 316(g), relating to motor carriers. This provision parallels ■§ 15(7) of Part I of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 15(7), relating to rail carriers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Public Utilities Com'n v. District Court, Denver
527 P.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1974)
National Industrial Traffic League v. United States
287 F. Supp. 129 (District of Columbia, 1968)
Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.
372 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1963)
North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. United States
200 F. Supp. 745 (D. Delaware, 1961)
Luckenbach Steamship Company v. United States
179 F. Supp. 605 (D. Delaware, 1959)
Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. United States
168 F. Supp. 819 (S.D. New York, 1958)
Coastwise Line v. United States
157 F. Supp. 305 (N.D. California, 1957)
Long Island Rail Road Company v. United States
140 F. Supp. 823 (E.D. New York, 1956)
Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United States
138 F. Supp. 411 (N.D. Texas, 1956)
Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United States
135 F. Supp. 823 (D. Delaware, 1955)
National Water Carriers Ass'n v. United States
126 F. Supp. 87 (S.D. New York, 1954)
Ferguson-Steere Motor Company v. United States
126 F. Supp. 588 (N.D. Texas, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 F. Supp. 398, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlsen-v-united-states-nysd-1952.