Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Carlsen v. Omaha Water Co.

Carlsen v. Omaha Water Co.

146 A.D. 702, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3345
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 3, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 146 A.D. 702 (Carlsen v. Omaha Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlsen v. Omaha Water Co., 146 A.D. 702, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Clarke, J.;

The plaintiff is the owner and holder of $2,000 in amount of the consolidated bonds of the Omaha Water Company, secured by its mortgage'executed and delivered to the Farmers’Loan and Trust Company as trustee. The questions submitted are similar to those presented in Harnickell v. Omaha Water [703]*703Co. (146 App. Div. 693), and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein handed down this day judgment should be for the plaintiff, as prayed in the complaint, with costs.

Ingraham, P. J., Scott and Dowling, JJ., concurred; Laughlin, J., dissented.

Judgment ordered for plaintiff. Order to be settled on. notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harnickell v. Omaha Water Co.
146 A.D. 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 A.D. 702, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlsen-v-omaha-water-co-nyappdiv-1911.