Carlotta Smith v. New West Stations, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Carlotta Smith v. New West Stations, Inc.

363 F. App'x 459

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2010·No. 08-15500·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Carlotta L. Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s Rule 52(c) judgment on partial findings in her Title VII action alleging unlawful retaliation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error. Golden v. Local 55, of the Int’l Ass’n of Firefighters, 633 F.2d 817, 820 (9th Cir.1980). We affirm.

Substantial evidence supports the district court’s determination that Smith failed to prove that she was fired in retaliation for opposing race discrimination. See id. at 822.

Smith’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM **

Carlotta L. Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s Rule 52(c) judgment on partial findings in her Title VII action alleging unlawful retaliation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error. Golden v. Local 55, of the Int’l Ass’n of Firefighters, 633 F.2d 817, 820 (9th Cir.1980). We affirm.

Substantial evidence supports the district court’s determination that Smith failed to prove that she was fired in retaliation for opposing race discrimination. See id. at 822.

Smith’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Carlotta Smith v. New West Stations, Inc., 363 F. App'x 459 (9th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

363 F. App'x 459 (Carlotta Smith v. New West Stations, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related