Carlotta Smith v. New West Stations, Inc.
This text of 363 F. App'x 459 (Carlotta Smith v. New West Stations, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Carlotta L. Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s Rule 52(c) judgment on partial findings in her Title VII action alleging unlawful retaliation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error. Golden v. Local 55, of the Int’l Ass’n of Firefighters, 633 F.2d 817, 820 (9th Cir.1980). We affirm.
Substantial evidence supports the district court’s determination that Smith failed to prove that she was fired in retaliation for opposing race discrimination. See id. at 822.
Smith’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
363 F. App'x 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlotta-smith-v-new-west-stations-inc-ca9-2010.