Carloss v. Colclough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Carloss v. Colclough

3 S.C.L. 462

DecidedNovember 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 462 (Carloss v. Colclough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carloss v. Colclough, 3 S.C.L. 462 (S.C. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

The court allowed the motion in this court to' prevail, and rever, sed the decision of the district court, on the ground, that such a' practice had never been adopted in any court of law in this country.

Note. Upon a suggestion merely, there being no affidavit, that if certain persons should die, their death would be prejudicial to the plaintiff’s title, a' commission issued to examine witnesses on the part of the plaintiff", although the defendant had not answered. Bagnold v. Green, 1 Dickens, 2. Carey’s Rep. 48, S. C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court allowed the motion in this court to' prevail, and rever, sed the decision of the district court, on the ground, that such a' practice had never been adopted in any court of law in this country.

Note. Upon a suggestion merely, there being no affidavit, that if certain persons should die, their death would be prejudicial to the plaintiff’s title, a' commission issued to examine witnesses on the part of the plaintiff", although the defendant had not answered. Bagnold v. Green, 1 Dickens, 2. Carey’s Rep. 48, S. C.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.C.L. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carloss-v-colclough-sc-1804.