Carlos Whitcomb v. State
This text of Carlos Whitcomb v. State (Carlos Whitcomb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2018
NO. 03-18-00248-CR
Carlos Whitcomb, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND
This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgments requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgments that requires
correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgments of conviction to reflect that
the “Statute for Offense” is “19.02(b)(1), (c) Penal Code.” The judgments, as modified, are
affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs
is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlos Whitcomb v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-whitcomb-v-state-texapp-2018.