Carlos Ramon Espinoza v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Order entered November 28, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00479-CR
CARLOS RAMON ESPINOZA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 296-81351-2021
ORDER
After our opinion in this case issued, appellant filed two pro se motions—a motion to have the appellate record provided to him free of charge and a motion to compel his attorney to provide him with the case file. Appellant was and is represented by appointed counsel in this appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(j). He has no right to “hybrid representation.” See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Accordingly, appellant’s November 16, 2022 pro se motions present nothing for review and are DENIED.
/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlos Ramon Espinoza v. the State of Texas (Carlos Ramon Espinoza v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.