Carlos Ramon Espinoza v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 28, 2022·No. 05-21-00480-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 28, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00479-CR

CARLOS RAMON ESPINOZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-81351-2021

ORDER

After our opinion in this case issued, appellant filed two pro se motions—a motion to have the appellate record provided to him free of charge and a motion to compel his attorney to provide him with the case file. Appellant was and is represented by appointed counsel in this appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(j). He has no right to “hybrid representation.” See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Accordingly, appellant’s November 16, 2022 pro se motions present nothing for review and are DENIED.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlos Ramon Espinoza v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Carlos Ramon Espinoza v. the State of Texas (Carlos Ramon Espinoza v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Bohannan
350 S.W.3d 116 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011)