Carlos Pacheco v. Homecomings Financial, LLC
This text of 464 F. App'x 593 (Carlos Pacheco v. Homecomings Financial, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Carlos Pacheco appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of lender defendants on his claim for rescission under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. Reviewing the district court’s order de novo, see Alpha Delta Chi-Delta Chapter v. Reed, 648 F.3d 790, 796 (9th Cir.2011), we affirm.
Because the parties contest Pacheco’s ability to tender the loan proceeds, this court’s holding in Yamamoto v. Bank of New York, 329 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir.2003) controls. Pacheco failed to produce any admissible evidence showing his ability to tender. The district court properly sustained objections to statements in Philip Lewis’s declaration. Thus, Pacheco did not meet his burden of showing the existence of a triable issue of fact as to his ability to tender, a necessary element for the remedy of rescission. Accordingly, the *594 district court properly granted summary judgment. See Yamamoto, 329 F.3d at 1173.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 F. App'x 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-pacheco-v-homecomings-financial-llc-ca9-2011.