Carlos Llwenlyn Petterson-Grifith v. State of Florida
This text of Carlos Llwenlyn Petterson-Grifith v. State of Florida (Carlos Llwenlyn Petterson-Grifith v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 27, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1944 Lower Tribunal No. F24-19721 ________________
Carlos Llwenlyn Petterson-Grifith, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Amy Weber, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daniel Colmenares, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. The State presented sufficient evidence for the jury to find Appellant
intended a battery. The evidence reflected Appellant was familiar with
firearms and intentionally fired the handgun twice at the tiles near the feet of
the victim, which drove tile shards into her legs. Accordingly, we affirm.
Pagan v. State, 830 So. 2d 792, 803 (Fla. 2002) (“If, after viewing the
evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could
find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt,
sufficient evidence exists to sustain a conviction.”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlos Llwenlyn Petterson-Grifith v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-llwenlyn-petterson-grifith-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.