Carlos I. Morin v. State
This text of Carlos I. Morin v. State (Carlos I. Morin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-12-0225-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JUNE 19, 2012 ______________________________
CARLOS I. MORIN,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE 137th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2007-418,394; HON. CECIL PURYEAR, PRESIDING _______________________________
Order of Dismissal _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Carlos I. Morin, appellant, attempts to appeal from his conviction for assault. The trial court pronounced sentence and signed the judgment in October of 2008. Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until June 1, 2012. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). Therefore, the deadline for perfecting an appeal here lapsed several years ago. A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, appellant's appeal is dismissed.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlos I. Morin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-i-morin-v-state-texapp-2012.