Carlos Gonzalez v. Clean Harbors, Inc.
Opinion
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARLOS GONZALEZ, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01727-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION v. ) ) (Doc. 35) CLEAN HARBORS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )
On March 17, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 35) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
Dated: March 19, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlos Gonzalez v. Clean Harbors, Inc. (Carlos Gonzalez v. Clean Harbors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.