Carlos Gonzalez v. Clean Harbors, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 19, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-01727·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

6 7 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 CARLOS GONZALEZ, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01727-JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. ) ) (Doc. 35) 14 CLEAN HARBORS, INC., et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 On March 17, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- 18 captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 35) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the 21 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the 23 Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24

26 Dated: March 19, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlos Gonzalez v. Clean Harbors, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Carlos Gonzalez v. Clean Harbors, Inc. (Carlos Gonzalez v. Clean Harbors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)