Carlos Gabriel Carus, Jr. v. Gladys Fidelia

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2024
Docket2023-0281
StatusPublished

This text of Carlos Gabriel Carus, Jr. v. Gladys Fidelia (Carlos Gabriel Carus, Jr. v. Gladys Fidelia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlos Gabriel Carus, Jr. v. Gladys Fidelia, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 10, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0281 Lower Tribunal No. 20-11733 CC ________________

Carlos Gabriel Carus, Jr., Appellant,

vs.

Gladys Fidelia, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. Barket, Judge.

Kenzie N. Sadlak, P.A. and Kenzie N. Sadlak, for appellant.

Topouzis & Associates, P.C., and Tyler E. Mesmer, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 720.3085(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“A parcel owner is jointly and severally liable with the previous parcel owner for all unpaid

assessments that came due up to the time of transfer of title.”); Villas of

Windmill Point II Prop. Owners’ Ass’n, Inc. v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 229

So. 3d 822, 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“[U]nder section 720.3085(2)(c), [the

third-party purchaser] does indirectly benefit from the safe harbor provision

because, under section 720.3085(2)(b), it is jointly and severally liable with

the prior parcel owner . . . for all unpaid assessments due up to the time of

transfer of title, and [the prior parcel owner] did qualify for the safe harbor

provision.”); Cong. Park Off. Condos II, LLC v. First-Citizens Bank & Tr. Co.,

105 So. 3d 602, 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“If the incomplete discovery will

not raise future disputed issues of material fact, summary judgment may be

properly granted.” (quoting Osorto v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 88 So. 3d

261, 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

VILLAS OF WINDMILL POINT II PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOC., INC. v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
229 So. 3d 822 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Congress Park Office Condos II, LLC v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
105 So. 3d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Osorto v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
88 So. 3d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carlos Gabriel Carus, Jr. v. Gladys Fidelia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-gabriel-carus-jr-v-gladys-fidelia-fladistctapp-2024.