Carlos Daniel Padilla v. State
This text of Carlos Daniel Padilla v. State (Carlos Daniel Padilla v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered April 30, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00248-CR
CARLOS DANIEL PADILLA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-59454-U
ORDER We REINSTATE this appeal.
On December 28, 2018, we ordered the trial court to hold a hearing on why appellant’s
brief had not been filed. We sent a February 15, 2019 letter asking the trial court about the status
of the hearing. On March 22, 2019, the trial court held a hearing; those findings of facts and
recommendations were filed with this Court on April 29, 2019, over one month later.
We ADOPT the trial court’s findings that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal and
that retained counsel Matthew Scott Pillado has not abandoned the appeal. The trial court
recommended that retained counsel be given an additional twenty-one days in which to file the
brief; twenty-one days from the date of the trial court’s order would have been April 12, 2019.
To date, no brief has been filed, and Mr. Pillado has not communicated with the Court. We therefore ORDER retained counsel Matthew Scott Pillado to file appellant’s brief
BY 5:00 P.M. ON MAY 10, 2019. Mr. Pillado is cautioned that the Court will not entertain any
further motions from him for any extensions of time in this case. If Mr. Pillado does not file a
brief by 5:00 p.m. on May 10, 2019, the Court will initiate contempt proceedings against him for
the failure and refusal to obey the Court’s order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4). The Court may
also take such other actions as may be appropriate, including filing a grievance against Mr.
Matthew Scott Pillado and referring this matter to the State Bar of Texas Commission for
Lawyer Discipline for further proceedings.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Matthew Scott Pillado
electronically as well as by certified mail at his address as shown in our records. We also
DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell, Presiding
Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office; and to
Carlos Daniel Padilla, TDCJ# 02186374, Lychner Unit, 2350 Atascocita Road, Humble, TX
77396.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlos Daniel Padilla v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-daniel-padilla-v-state-texapp-2019.