Carlos D.A. Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

124 F.3d 64, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23885, 1997 WL 537347
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided August 28, 1997·No. 97-1428·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER OF COURT

The INS contends that the appropriate court in which to raise a constitutional or jurisdictional challenge to a deportation order is the court of appeals in the context of a petition for judicial review, rather than the district court in the context of a habeas petition. Consequently, the INS has moved for reconsideration of our April 17, 1997 order, which dismissed petitioner’s petition for judicial review for lack of jurisdiction, but left open the possibility that petitioner might be able to obtain some review through a habeas petition filed in the district. The INS’s position is foreclosed by our decision in Kolster v. INS, 101 F.3d 785 (1st Cir.1996).

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlos D.A. Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 124 F.3d 64, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23885, 1997 WL 537347 (1st Cir. 1997).

124 F.3d 64 (Carlos D.A. Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Podoprigora v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
98 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D. Massachusetts, 2000)
Wallace v. Reno
39 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D. Massachusetts, 1999)
Ruckbi v. INS
First Circuit, 1998
Ruckbi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
159 F.3d 18 (First Circuit, 1998)
Perceira Goncalves v. INS
First Circuit, 1998