Carlos D.A. Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This text of 124 F.3d 64 (Carlos D.A. Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER OF COURT
The INS contends that the appropriate court in which to raise a constitutional or jurisdictional challenge to a deportation order is the court of appeals in the context of a petition for judicial review, rather than the district court in the context of a habeas petition. Consequently, the INS has moved for reconsideration of our April 17, 1997 order, which dismissed petitioner’s petition for judicial review for lack of jurisdiction, but left open the possibility that petitioner might be able to obtain some review through a habeas petition filed in the district. The INS’s position is foreclosed by our decision in Kolster v. INS, 101 F.3d 785 (1st Cir.1996).
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 F.3d 64, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23885, 1997 WL 537347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-da-santos-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca1-1997.