Carlos Calbillo v. San Jacinto Junior College, to Wit: Dr. O. W. Marcom

Fifth Circuit

Carlos Calbillo v. San Jacinto Junior College, to Wit: Dr. O. W. Marcom

446 F.2d 887, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8630

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carlos Calbillo v. San Jacinto Junior College, to Wit: Dr. O. W. Marcom. Read the opinion of the Court — 434 F.2d 609 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 6, 1971·No. 71-1545_1·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The prior history of this litigation is reported, 305 F.Supp. 857 and 434 F.2d 609. The action of this Court was to remand the appeal from a preliminary injunction for consideration of its possible mootness by the lower court.

On December 31, 1970, the district court vacated its preliminary injunction and dismissed the case as moot. On the face of the order of dismissal the attorneys for the parties noted their approval.

Thereafter, on January 25, 1971, the district court, sua sponte, without notice to the parties, entered an order alluding to an amended Junior College regulation which had been adopted subsequent to our remand. The amended regulation was not then under attack or challenge from Carlos Calbillo or any other litigant.

Since the district court on January 25, 1971, did not have before it any justicia-ble cause or controversy, requisite to jurisdiction, Article III, Constitution of the United States, the Order of that date is vacated and the Order of December 31, 1970, is affirmed, terminating this litigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

The prior history of this litigation is reported, 305 F.Supp. 857 and 434 F.2d 609. The action of this Court was to remand the appeal from a preliminary injunction for consideration of its possible mootness by the lower court.

On December 31, 1970, the district court vacated its preliminary injunction and dismissed the case as moot. On the face of the order of dismissal the attorneys for the parties noted their approval.

Thereafter, on January 25, 1971, the district court, sua sponte, without notice to the parties, entered an order alluding to an amended Junior College regulation which had been adopted subsequent to our remand. The amended regulation was not then under attack or challenge from Carlos Calbillo or any other litigant.

Since the district court on January 25, 1971, did not have before it any justicia-ble cause or controversy, requisite to jurisdiction, Article III, Constitution of the United States, the Order of that date is vacated and the Order of December 31, 1970, is affirmed, terminating this litigation.

Carlos Calbillo v. San Jacinto Junior College, to Wit: Dr. O. W. Marcom, 446 F.2d 887, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8630 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

446 F.2d 887 (Carlos Calbillo v. San Jacinto Junior College, to Wit: Dr. O. W. Marcom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related