CARLOS CAICEDO and GLORIA CAICEDO v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CARLOS CAICEDO and GLORIA CAICEDO v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 31, 2020

Docket19-3827

StatusPublished

This text of CARLOS CAICEDO and GLORIA CAICEDO v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. (CARLOS CAICEDO and GLORIA CAICEDO v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CARLOS CAICEDO and GLORIA CAICEDO v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CARLOS CAICEDO and GLORIA CAICEDO, Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Appellee.

No. 4D19-3827

[December 31, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nicholas Richard Lopane, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE13-019155.

Erin M. Berger and Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, Tampa, for appellant.

Elizabeth K. Russo of Russo Appellate Firm P.A. and Steven J. Chackman of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI