Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Loretta E. Lynch

Ninth Circuit

Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Loretta E. Lynch

835 F.3d 891, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10766, 2016 WL 3262628

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Loretta E. Lynch. Read the opinion of the Court — 805 F.3d 1171 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2016·No. 13-72682·Published

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges McKeown and Watford did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges McKeown and Watford did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Loretta E. Lynch, 835 F.3d 891, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10766, 2016 WL 3262628 (9th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

835 F.3d 891 (Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Loretta E. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.