Carlos Almeida v. Clark Ducart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2019·No. 17-16302·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2019

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CARLOS ALMEIDA, No. 17-16302

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02689-JD Northern District of California, v. San Francisco

CLARK E. DUCART, Warden; R. BELL, Assistant Warden; D. GONGORA; J. ORDER BEESON, Special Agent; R. BURT, Special Agent; B. NEAL, Counselor,

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GRABER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,* District Judge.

The mandate issued on May 16, 2019 is recalled, and the panel issues the

following changes to the memorandum disposition filed April 24, 2019:

Page 1, lines 1–2, replacing “pro se federal habeas petition” with “Section 1983 complaint” Page 2, line 3, replacing “petition” with “complaint”

No further motions will be entertained in this case, and the mandate will be

reissued forthwith. The petition for panel rehearing, filed June 6, 2019, is

DENIED.

The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI