CARLOS A. NUNEZ XENES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of CARLOS A. NUNEZ XENES v. STATE OF FLORIDA (CARLOS A. NUNEZ XENES v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
CARLOS A. NUNEZ XENES,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D21-977
September 16, 2022
Appeal from the County Court for Hendry County; Darrell R. Hill, Judge.
Wayne R. Atkins and Matthew J. Troccoli of Xander Law Group, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea N. Simms, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Stahl, 206 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA
2016). But see Garcia v. State, 302 So. 3d 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020), review granted, SC20-1419, 2020 WL 7230441 (Fla. Dec. 8,
2020) (certifying conflict with Stahl, 206 So. 3d 124, and certifying
questions related to whether defendants can be compelled to orally
disclose a smartphone passcode).
SILBERMAN, ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CARLOS A. NUNEZ XENES v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-a-nunez-xenes-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.