Carlos A. Gonzalez v. Brooke Randel
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00205-CV
Carlos A. Gonzalez, Appellant
v.
Brooke Randel, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-13-010603, HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 3, 2015, of an order granting a court
reporter’s objections, motion to quash, and motion for protective order concerning a subpoena that
was served on the court reporter by appellant. The subpoena purports to require the court reporter
to release audiotapes of a pre-trial hearing in an unrelated case.
On April 13, 2015, the Clerk of this Court requested a response from appellant by
April 23, 2015. The Clerk advised appellant that he must inform this Court of the basis on which
jurisdiction exists or that this Court would dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed a response, but he failed to show how this Court has appellate
jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 51.012 (addressing appeals from
final judgments), .014 (addressing appeals of interlocutory orders); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (noting that generally appeal may be taken only from final
judgments). Thus, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: April 29, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlos A. Gonzalez v. Brooke Randel (Carlos A. Gonzalez v. Brooke Randel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.