Carlo v. Carlo
This text of 30 A.D.2d 530 (Carlo v. Carlo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for separation, in which the defendant-husband counterclaimed for annulment, he appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 18, 1967, as allowed plaintiff $420 for counsel fees and for obtaining a transcript of the stenographic minutes of the trial, in the prosecution of her appeal from the judgment rendered after trial. Order affirmed, with $25 costs and dsibursements. The allowance granted rested within the discretionary power of the Special Term (Math v. Math, 28 A D 2d 723; Martin v. Martin, 28 A D 2d 897). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 530, 291 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlo-v-carlo-nyappdiv-1968.