Carlo Manuel Carson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carlo Manuel Carson v. State

190 So. 3d 98

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 2015

Docket4D14-3931

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 98 (Carlo Manuel Carson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carlo Manuel Carson v. State, 190 So. 3d 98 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CARLO MANUEL CARSON, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D14-3931

[March 25, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF003625A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required by appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence without prejudice to his right to timely seek postconviction remedies under rule 3.850, if appropriate. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.

MAY, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI