Carlisle v. State

280 S.W. 590, 103 Tex. Crim. 276, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 180
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 20, 1926
DocketNo. 9822.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 S.W. 590 (Carlisle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlisle v. State, 280 S.W. 590, 103 Tex. Crim. 276, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 180 (Tex. 1926).

Opinions

BERRY, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment is one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant urged some exceptions to the court’s charge and we think these are without merit. His main criticism was leveled at that portion of the court’s charge which submitted the statute with reference to the possession of more than a quart of liquor. We think the charge as submitted conforms to the authorities. In fact it seems to follow the ruling of this court in the case of Caldwell v. State, 273 S. W. 608, and the authorities there cited.

There are no other bills of exceptions contained in the record and a consideration of the statement of facts convinces us that the evidence is entirely sufficient to support the verdict.

It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leming v. State
17 S.W.2d 1075 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 S.W. 590, 103 Tex. Crim. 276, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlisle-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.