Carlisle v. State
1910 OK CR 6, 106 P. 349, 3 Okla. Crim. 365, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 11, 1910
DocketNo. A-87.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 1910 OK CR 6 (Carlisle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carlisle v. State, 1910 OK CR 6, 106 P. 349, 3 Okla. Crim. 365, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
Notice of appeal was not served npon the connty attorney or npon the clerk of the court in which the judgment was rendered, as is required by section 6949 of Snyder’s Comp. Laws Okla. 1909.
The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal npon this ground must therefore be sustained. Boneparte v. State, ante, p. 345, 106 Pac. 347.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Holliman v. Cole
1934 OK 381 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1910 OK CR 6, 106 P. 349, 3 Okla. Crim. 365, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlisle-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.