Carlisle v. State

706 So. 2d 414, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2477, 1998 WL 107312
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 1998
DocketNo. 98-405
StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 414 (Carlisle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlisle v. State, 706 So. 2d 414, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2477, 1998 WL 107312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), rev. dismissed, 613 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993) (holding a criminal defendant does not have the right to a hybrid representation, and by requesting counsel, the defendant waived his right to self-representation).

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salser v. State
613 So. 2d 471 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Salser v. State
582 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 414, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2477, 1998 WL 107312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlisle-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.