Carlisle v. State

706 So. 2d 414, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2477, 1998 WL 107312
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carlisle v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 773 So. 2d 647
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1998·No. No. 98-405·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), rev. dismissed, 613 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993) (holding a criminal defendant does not have the right to a hybrid representation, and by requesting counsel, the defendant waived his right to self-representation).

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlisle v. State, 706 So. 2d 414, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2477, 1998 WL 107312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 414 (Carlisle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salser v. State
613 So. 2d 471 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Salser v. State
582 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)