Carlisle v. State

91 Ala. 1
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 91 Ala. 1 (Carlisle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlisle v. State, 91 Ala. 1 (Ala. 1890).

Opinion

STONE, C. J.

The statute approved December 12,1888— Sess. Acts, 258 — enacts “that from and after the first of January, 1889, it shall be unlawful for any person or persons to sell, give away, barter, exchange, or otherwise dispose of any alcoholic, vinous, or malt liquors,” &c. . . . “within three miles of the Methodist anc£ Baptist churches in the town of Daviston, in Tallapoosa county.” The proof in this cáse showed that the accused sold a pint of whiskey to one IT., and received the money therefor; and that the sale was made [2]*2within three miles of the said Baptist church, but not within three miles of the said Methodist church. It was and is contended, that to come within the prohibition of the statute, the sale must be made within three miles of both of the churches.

We think this too narrow and technical a view of the statute. The manifest purpose of the enactment was to protect worshipping assemblies from annoying disturbances, which sometimes attend the sale of intoxicating drinks. And the protection was intended to be extended equally and alike to the two churches. In other words, the legislative intent was to establish a prohibition district, which should include an area extending three miles in every direction from the churches. Such district necessarily includes every foot of ground which is less than three miles from both churches.

There is no error in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Town of Wilmer
376 So. 2d 698 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)
Broughton v. ALA. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL
348 So. 2d 1059 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
State Ex Rel. Woodruff v. Centanne
89 So. 2d 570 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 Ala. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlisle-v-state-ala-1890.