Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department

Eighth Circuit

Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department

301 F. App'x 571

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2008·No. 07-2756·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Carlisle appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

George Carlisle appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department, 301 F. App'x 571 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

301 F. App'x 571 (Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related