Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department

Eighth Circuit

Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department

301 F. App'x 571

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 4, 2008

Docket07-2756

StatusUnpublished

This text of 301 F. App'x 571 (Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carlisle v. St. Charles County, HR Department, 301 F. App'x 571 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Carlisle appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

George Carlisle appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 F. App'x 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlisle-v-st-charles-county-hr-department-ca8-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack