Carlisle v. South Dakota
238 U.S. 609, 35 S. Ct. 663, 59 L. Ed. 1487, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1396
This text of 238 U.S. 609 (Carlisle v. South Dakota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carlisle v. South Dakota, 238 U.S. 609, 35 S. Ct. 663, 59 L. Ed. 1487, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1396 (1915).
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; see Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505; Watson v. Maryland, 218 U. S. 173; Collins v. Texas, 223 U. S. 288.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dent v. West Virginia
129 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Reetz v. Michigan
188 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Fay v. Crozer
217 U.S. 455 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Watson v. Maryland
218 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Hendricks v. United States
223 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Collins v. Texas
223 U.S. 288 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
238 U.S. 609, 35 S. Ct. 663, 59 L. Ed. 1487, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlisle-v-south-dakota-scotus-1915.