Carlisle v. South Dakota
238 U.S. 609, 35 S. Ct. 663, 59 L. Ed. 1487, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1396
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; see Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505; Watson v. Maryland, 218 U. S. 173; Collins v. Texas, 223 U. S. 288.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlisle v. South Dakota, 238 U.S. 609, 35 S. Ct. 663, 59 L. Ed. 1487, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1396 (1915).
238 U.S. 609 (Carlisle v. South Dakota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dent v. West Virginia
129 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Reetz v. Michigan
188 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Fay v. Crozer
217 U.S. 455 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Watson v. Maryland
218 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Hendricks v. United States
223 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Collins v. Texas
223 U.S. 288 (Supreme Court, 1912)