Carlisle v. Russell

30 S.W. 118, 127 Mo. 465, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 271
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 12, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Brace, P. J.

The appellant having failed to file in this case anything which is, or purports to be, an abstract of the record, as required by rule 12, the appeal ought to be, and is, dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlisle v. Russell, 30 S.W. 118, 127 Mo. 465, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 271 (Mo. 1895).

30 S.W. 118 (Carlisle v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snoddy v. Jasper County
47 S.W. 906 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
Frame v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World
67 Mo. App. 127 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)