Carlisle v. Chrestman

Mississippi Supreme Court

Carlisle v. Chrestman

69 Miss. 392

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 Miss. 392 (Carlisle v. Chrestman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carlisle v. Chrestman, 69 Miss. 392 (Mich. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Complainant acquired title to the land under the sale for taxes of May, 1868, to the levee board, and by the conveyances under which he claims the title thus secured by the board. Carlisle v. Yoder, ante, 384.

The sale of March, 1882, was invalid, because the assess[393]*393ment-roll for tbe year 1879 (under which the sale was made) was not returned by the assessor on the first Monday of July, as required by law, Fletcher v. Trewalla, 60 Miss., 963.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Complainant acquired title to the land under the sale for taxes of May, 1868, to the levee board, and by the conveyances under which he claims the title thus secured by the board. Carlisle v. Yoder, ante, 384.

The sale of March, 1882, was invalid, because the assess[393]*393ment-roll for tbe year 1879 (under which the sale was made) was not returned by the assessor on the first Monday of July, as required by law, Fletcher v. Trewalla, 60 Miss., 963.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 Miss. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlisle-v-chrestman-miss-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack