Carlisle v. Carlisle

283 S.W.3d 810, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 366, 2009 WL 685600
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2009·No. ED 90371·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The husband, George W. Carlisle, Jr., appeals the judgment pendente lite entered by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his request for temporary maintenance. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1). All pending motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlisle v. Carlisle, 283 S.W.3d 810, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 366, 2009 WL 685600 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

283 S.W.3d 810 (Carlisle v. Carlisle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. State
283 S.W.3d 810 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)