Carlisle Trust Co. v. Directors of the Poor
79 Pa. Super. 241, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 223
Opinion
The plaintiff’s statement of claim and the defendant’s affidavit of defense present a purely legal question, and this has been so fully and clearly considered and disposed of in the opinion filed in the court below, in entering a judgment in favor of the defendant, that it is needless to supplement it by further argument or authority.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlisle Trust Co. v. Directors of the Poor, 79 Pa. Super. 241, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 223 (Pa. Ct. App. 1922).
79 Pa. Super. 241 (Carlisle Trust Co. v. Directors of the Poor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shultz v. Blank
9 Pa. D. & C. 551 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Ritchey v. Pratto
4 Pa. D. & C. 188 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)