Carlino v. Downs

242 A.D. 631

This text of 242 A.D. 631 (Carlino v. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlino v. Downs, 242 A.D. 631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Motion for a prohibition order against the county judge of Queens county in Matter of Carlina v. Downs, denied, without costs. This court in the first instance has no power to grant an alternative prohibition order against a judge of an inferior court. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1343 and 1344.) In our opinion, the commitment already made and any resettled or amended commitment may be reviewed by certiorari. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlino-v-downs-nyappdiv-1934.