Carlino v. Downs

242 A.D. 631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carlino v. Downs. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D. 801

Opinion

Motion for a prohibition order against the county judge of Queens county in Matter of Carlina v. Downs, denied, without costs. This court in the first instance has no power to grant an alternative prohibition order against a judge of an inferior court. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1343 and 1344.) In our opinion, the commitment already made and any resettled or amended commitment may be reviewed by certiorari. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlino v. Downs, 242 A.D. 631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 631 (Carlino v. Downs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.