Carlin v. United States

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJanuary 23, 2023
Docket22-1803
StatusUnpublished

This text of Carlin v. United States (Carlin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlin v. United States, (uscfc 2023).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-1803C (Filed: January 23, 2023) NOT FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** JULIA CARLIN, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * *************************************** ORDER Ms. Julia Carlin, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against the United States of America. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $402.00 in fees—a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee—or request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees by submitting a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Ms. Carlin submitted her complaint without the filing fees or a completed IFP application. In an order dated December 14, 2022, this Court ordered Ms. Carlin to either pay the $402.00 in required fees or submit an IFP application within thirty days. See Order (ECF 6). To date, Ms. Carlin has failed to comply with this Court’s previous order. This Court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute when the plaintiff “fails … to comply with these rules or a court order.” RCFC 41(b). Here, Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order directing her to pay the filing fee or establish grounds for proceeding in forma pauperis justifies dismissal. See, e.g., Bryant v. United States, 618 F. App’x 683, 686 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (“If a party fails to pay the requisite filing fee, despite adequate notice and ample opportunity to do so, the Claims Court acts within its discretion when it dismisses the action.”). As a result, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Stephen S. Schwartz STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ Judge

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. United States
618 F. App'x 683 (Federal Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carlin v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlin-v-united-states-uscfc-2023.