Carlin v. New York City Railway Co.

108 N.Y.S. 1020
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 5, 1908·Published

Opinion

BISCHOEF, J.

The question whether the plaintiff was a bona fide passenger had a material bearing upon his right to recover the statutory penalty for the defendant’s refusal to carry him without further payment of a fare. Nicholson v. N. Y. City Ry. Co., 118 App. Div. 858, 103 N. Y. Supp. 695. While the rulings of the justice, excluding proof upon this issue, were supported by certain decisions announced prior to the time of the trial, the authority cited necessarily requires a reversal of this judgment.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlin v. New York City Railway Co., 108 N.Y.S. 1020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

108 N.Y.S. 1020 (Carlin v. New York City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicholson v. New York City Railway Co.
118 A.D. 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)