Carlile Davis v. State

262 S.W. 489, 97 Tex. Crim. 477, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 901
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 28, 1923·No. No. 7923.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Appellants were convicted of robbery, and the verdict and judgment condemned them to five years confinement in the penitentiary.

Our State's Attorney calls attention to the fact that the record fails to show that any sentence was ever pronounced against either of them, and for this reason files a motion to dismiss the appeal. In a felony case less than capital sentence is a prerequisite of appeal. See Article 856, Vernon's C.C.P. and the authorities collated thereunder; also Robinson v. State,54 Tex. Crim. 559).

The motion of the State is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

APPEAL REINSTATED.
May 28, 1924.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlile Davis v. State, 262 S.W. 489, 97 Tex. Crim. 477, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 901 (Tex. 1923).

262 S.W. 489 (Carlile Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Engelking
771 S.W.2d 213 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Young v. State
254 S.W.2d 523 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Cleveland v. State
82 S.W.2d 974 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Punchard v. State
61 S.W.2d 495 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Cotton v. State
25 S.W.2d 857 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)