Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Carliczek v. Rothenstein

Carliczek v. Rothenstein

210 Ill. App. 270
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 16, 1918
DocketGen. No. 23,321
StatusPublished

This text of 210 Ill. App. 270 (Carliczek v. Rothenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carliczek v. Rothenstein, 210 Ill. App. 270 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Set-off and becottpment, § 17*—what inadmissible by way of recoupment. In an action to recover a balance alleged to be due on a promissory note, items arising out of matters unconnected with the execution and delivery of the note are inadmissible by way of recoupment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 Ill. App. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carliczek-v-rothenstein-illappct-1918.