Carley Printing Co. v. Fleming
Opinion
Appellant brought suit against appellees for the alleged conversion of certain personal property. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for the appellees. Appellant duly requested the court to file its findings of fact and conclusions of law. This was not done. Appellant excepted to the action of the court in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law. No statement of facts has been filed in this court. Such being the state of the record, this case must be reversed and remanded. Wandry v. Williams, 103 Tex. 91, 124 S. W. 85; Sutherland v. Kirkland, 134 S. W. 851; Wood v. Smith, 141 S. W. 796; Ry. Co. v. Turner, 193 S. W. 1087; Lester v. Oldham, 208 S. W. 575: Buckner v. Davis, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 493, 129 S. W. 639; Stryker v. Van Veteer, 212 S. W. 675.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
220 S.W. 789 (Carley Printing Co. v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.