Carley Printing Co. v. Fleming

220 S.W. 789, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 404
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 18, 1920·No. No. 6158.·Published

Opinion

JENKINS, J.

Appellant brought suit against appellees for the alleged conversion of certain personal property. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for the appellees. Appellant duly requested the court to file its findings of fact and conclusions of law. This was not done. Appellant excepted to the action of the court in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law. No statement of facts has been filed in this court. Such being the state of the record, this case must be reversed and remanded. Wandry v. Williams, 103 Tex. 91, 124 S. W. 85; Sutherland v. Kirkland, 134 S. W. 851; Wood v. Smith, 141 S. W. 796; Ry. Co. v. Turner, 193 S. W. 1087; Lester v. Oldham, 208 S. W. 575: Buckner v. Davis, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 493, 129 S. W. 639; Stryker v. Van Veteer, 212 S. W. 675.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley Printing Co. v. Fleming, 220 S.W. 789, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 404 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

220 S.W. 789 (Carley Printing Co. v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Turner
193 S.W. 1087 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Wandry v. Williams
124 S.W. 85 (Texas Supreme Court, 1910)
Lester v. Oldham
208 S.W. 575 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Wood v. Smith
141 S.W. 795 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Williams v. Davenport
212 S.W. 675 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Sutherland v. Kirkland
134 S.W. 851 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Buckner v. Davis
129 S.W. 639 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)