Carleton Buck v. City of Highland Park
This text of Carleton Buck v. City of Highland Park (Carleton Buck v. City of Highland Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 29, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 152192 & (61) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, CARLETON BUCK, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 152192 COA: 320967 Wayne CC: 12-010985-NO CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, CURTIS WHITE, and JANE DOE, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion to amend is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 29, 2016 d0321 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carleton Buck v. City of Highland Park, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carleton-buck-v-city-of-highland-park-mich-2016.