Carleson v. Omaha Water Co.
This text of 131 N.Y.S. 495 (Carleson v. Omaha Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff is the owner and holder of $2,000 in amount of the consolidated bonds of the Omaha Water Company, secured by its mort-. gage executed and delivered to the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, as trustee. The questions submitted are similar to those presented in Harnickell v. Omaha Water Company and Guaranty Trust Company of New York, 131 N. Y. Supp. 489, and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein handed down this day, judgment should be for the plaintiff as prayed in the complaint, with costs.
INGRAHAM, P. J., and SCOTT and DOWLING, JJ., concur. LAUGHLIN, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 N.Y.S. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carleson-v-omaha-water-co-nyappdiv-1911.