Carla Depaza v. Austin International Ventures Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 2015
Docket05-15-00099-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Carla Depaza v. Austin International Ventures Inc. (Carla Depaza v. Austin International Ventures Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carla Depaza v. Austin International Ventures Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Dismissal and Opinion Filed July 13, 2015

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00099-CV

CARLA DEPAZA, Appellant V. AUSTIN INTERNATIONAL VENTURES INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06412-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By

postcard dated January 23, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated January 23, 2015, we

notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant

to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so

might result in dismissal of the appeal. By letter dated March 27, 2015, we informed appellant

the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to

pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to

do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has

not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or provided written documentation that she

has been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs in the trial court.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

150099F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

CARLA DEPAZA, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-00099-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06412-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. AUSTIN INTERNATIONAL VENTURES Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart INC., Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered July 13, 2015.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carla Depaza v. Austin International Ventures Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carla-depaza-v-austin-international-ventures-inc-texapp-2015.