Carla Cruz-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 2026
Docket25-1475
StatusUnpublished

This text of Carla Cruz-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi (Carla Cruz-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carla Cruz-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi, (4th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1475 Doc: 27 Filed: 01/06/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1475

CARLA MARINA CRUZ-HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: January 6, 2026

Before GREGORY, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Brittany Pierce, LIVELY LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Brett A. Shumate, Assistant Attorney General, Margot P. Kniffin, Senior Litigation Counsel, Giovanni B. Di Maggio, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1475 Doc: 27 Filed: 01/06/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Carla Marina Cruz-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to

reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Cruz-Hernandez’s claims and

find no abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2025); see Williams v. Garland, 59 F.4th

620, 632 (4th Cir. 2023). Accordingly, we grant Cruz-Hernandez’s motion to file her

corrected reply brief out of time and deny the petition for review. In re Cruz-Hernandez

(B.I.A. Apr. 8, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Damien Williams v. Merrick Garland
59 F.4th 620 (Fourth Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carla Cruz-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carla-cruz-hernandez-v-pamela-bondi-ca4-2026.