Carla Bouvier v. Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-25-00016-CV
CARLA BOUVIER, Appellant
V.
DOYCE ELAINE THOMPSON, GERAY WILLIAMS, AND JUDY SHOFU, Appellees
On Appeal from the 17th District Court Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 017-350187-24
Before Wallach, J; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was due on June 13, 2025. On June 24, 2025, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: July 24, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carla Bouvier v. Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu (Carla Bouvier v. Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.