Carla Bouvier v. Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu
This text of Carla Bouvier v. Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu (Carla Bouvier v. Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00016-CV ___________________________
CARLA BOUVIER, Appellant
V.
DOYCE ELAINE THOMPSON, GERAY WILLIAMS, AND JUDY SHOFU, Appellees
On Appeal from the 17th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 017-350187-24
Before Wallach, J; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on June 13, 2025. On June 24, 2025, we notified
appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an
accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an
extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have
received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: July 24, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carla Bouvier v. Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carla-bouvier-v-doyce-elaine-thompson-geray-williams-and-judy-shofu-texapp-2025.